Dating rocks with fossils
Radiocarbon dating is actually of little use to evolutionists. First, no rocks and relatively few fossils contain measurable quantities of carbon of any kind.Second, because of the short half-life of C, the radiocarbon method can only date specimens up to about 50,000 years of age.
Finally in 1976, they discovered that the earth is “really” 4.6 billion years old.These dates indicate that for 100 years, the age of the earth doubled every 20 years.If this trend were to continue, the earth would be 700 thousand-trillion-trillion-trillion years old by the year 4000 AD.It has all become something of a “dating game” in which only the evolutionarily correct are allowed to play.The most widely used method for determining the age of fossils is to date them by the “known age” of the rock strata in which they are found.In the case of radiocarbon dating, an unstable isotope of carbon (C by half every 5,730 years (the half-life).
In other words, the less of the parent isotope (and the more of the daughter isotope) we measure in a specimen, the older we assume it to be.
Since fossils are rarely found in igneous rocks, one can only date lava flows that are occasionally found between layers of sedimentary rock.
The problem with all radiometric “clocks” is that their accuracy critically depends on several starting assumptions that are largely unknowable.
The universe is full of naturally occurring radioactive elements.
Radioactive atoms are inherently unstable; over time, radioactive "parent atoms" decay into stable "daughter atoms." When molten rock cools, forming what are called igneous rocks, radioactive atoms are trapped inside. By measuring the quantity of unstable atoms left in a rock and comparing it to the quantity of stable daughter atoms in the rock, scientists can estimate the amount of time that has passed since that rock formed.
This “prediction,” however, is based on selected data and certain assumptions that might not be true.